Why Most Startups Need a “Business Guy”
April 21, 2011 Leave a comment
I read an intriguing blog post titled “What the Hell Does a “Business Guy” Do? by serial entrepreneur Rob Walling. The basic premise of his post is that the only compelling reason a “technical founder” should bring on a “business founder” (BF) as a partner is if that BF has “successful marketing experience”. While I agree that marketing, specifically customer acquisition, is probably the most important and difficult problem to solve in a startup’s early days, I believe there are other important aspects of both building a team and a foundation for scaling the business that technical founders (in my experience) don’t always possess.
Of course I’m biased, because I represent the BF that Rob discusses. Having been on the ground floor of 3 startups as the lead business and operations person, there are a few consistent areas of value that I’ve seen critical to early stage success, in addition to the marketing/customer acquisition skills Rob mentioned.
I would define these areas of value in the context of what I believe a BF profile must look like. In my opinion, a credible BF needs to have demonstrated operational success in a startup environment, from early product development through financing, rapid growth and scale, including:
- has been through multiple early product fails and iterations
- has a high tolerance for ambiguity, chaos and daily priority changes
- can contribute immediately in at least one critical business functional role at the outset – Marketing or Biz Dev ideally
- has navigated a financing from external investors
- has built a cohesive, uber-talented team that are the best at what they do AND that share similar culture sensibilities and work ethic (this is hard to do)
- has successfully acquired and scaled customers, partners and revenue
- has established metrics for tracking business success and a way to reliably measure and adjust
- has battle scars, fail stories and an ability to articulate why the same fails won’t happen again.
So, this BF is not just a strategist or marketer, but a true partner to the entrepreneur who has a unique ability to take the entrepreneur’s vision and build a real business out of it. The importance of this experience should not be underestimated. True visionary entrepreneurs typically have an “anything’s possible” belief system and won’t be deterred. Balancing that perspective with someone who can implement and tolerate that kind of ambiguity and chaos is paramount.
If the technical co-founder has experience in all these areas, then yes, I agree with Rob that partnering with a non-technical founder may just represent unnecessary equity dilution, but I’d venture there are lot’s of new businesses being created right now by super-developers without these important experiences under their belts.
Some might argue that all of these skills don’t have to be wrapped up in one person and that they don’t have to all be present at the earliest stages of a company’s development. It ultimately comes down to the skills and experiences of the original founder, but having a BF partner who has been through the “business building” process successfully can ensure the correct sequencing of process, people and technology and let the entrepreneur focus on high value creation – strategy, product and funding.
What do you think?